• Free Consultation
  • Free IP Audit
  • International Brand Protection
  • About
  • Careers
  • Global IP Blogs
  • Contact
  • Login
Lexprotector.com
+1 – 888 890 6411 [email protected]
  • Trademark
    • Trademark Search
      • Indian Trademark Search
      • USA Trademark Search
      • EU Trademark Search
      • UK Trademark Search
      • Canada Trademark Search
      • Australia Trademark Search
      • New Zealand Trademark Search
    • Trademark Registration
      • Indian Trademark Registration
      • USA Trademark Registration
      • EU Trademark Registration
      • UK Trademark Registration
      • Canada Trademark Registration
      • Australia Trademark Registration
      • New Zealand Trademark Registration
    • Trademark Monitoring
      • Indian Trademark Monitoring
      • USA Trademark Monitoring
      • EU Trademark Monitoring
      • UK Trademark Monitoring
      • Canada Trademark Monitoring
      • Australia Trademark Monitoring
      • New Zealand Trademark Monitoring
    • Trademark Consultation
      • Indian Trademark Consultation
      • USA Trademark Consultation
      • EU Trademark Consultation
      • UK Trademark Consultation
      • Canada Trademark Consultation
      • Australia Trademark Consultation
      • New Zealand Trademark Consultation
  • Patent
    • Patent Search
      • Prior Art Search
      • Freedom to Operate Search
      • Utility Patent Search
    • Patent Drafting
      • USA Provisional Patent Drafting
      • USA Non-Provisional Patent Drafting
      • Indian Provisional Patent Drafting
      • Indian Complete Specification Drafting
    • Patent Filing
      • USA Provisional Patent Filing
      • USA Non-Provisional Patent Filing
      • Indian Provisional Patent Filing
      • Indian Complete Specification Filing
    • Patent Consultation
      • Patent Consultation
      • Utility Patent Consultation
      • Design Patent Consultation
    • Design Patent
      • Design Patent Search
      • EU Design Patent Filing
      • USA Design Patent Filing
      • India Industrial Design Filing
  • IP Enforcement
    • Violation Search
    • DMCA Takedown Notice
    • IP Enforcement
      • Copyright Enforcement
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Utility Patent Enforcement
      • Design Patent Enforcement
    • Amazon Brand Registration
    • Copyright Registration
      • Indian Copyright Registration
      • USA Copyright Registration
  • IP Management
    • IP Due Diligence
    • IP Auditing
    • IP Valuation
    • IP Licensing
    • IP Consultation
+1 – 888 890 6411 [email protected]

How the FUCT a mark becomes scandalous or Immoral

  • Older
  • Newer

How the FUCT a mark becomes scandalous or Immoral

Written By: Rutuparna Acharya

A mark shall not be registered as a trade mark if it comprises or contains scandalous or obscene matter. This principle is followed in almost all the countries as one of the ground of refusal for Trademark Registration. It is followed in U.S; “Under Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. §1052(a), which is an absolute bar to the registration of immoral or scandalous matter on either the Principal Register or the Supplemental Register”. But then what amounts to scandalous or immoral under which circumstances is a matter of issue, which differs from case to case.

Picture Courtesy: www.facebook.com

Can a trademark be rejected on the ground that it could be perceived with an equivalent vulgar word and/or read out differently? This issue is addressed recently in the case of Iancu v. Brunetti and decided by the US Supreme Court, in favour of the clothing brand FUCT, where  the court held that the name could be trademarked. This case has become a First Amendment case about “immoral or scandalous” trademarks, wherein it was pronounced that the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) violated an entrepreneur’s free-speech rights, by denying trademark registration for his clothing brand FUCT.

FUCT is an abbreviation for Friends U Can’t Trust, according to Erik Brunetti, the artist and designer who has been using the name since 1990. In 2011, Brunetti had applied for federal registration of the mark, the request was first granted—then, unusually, denied “on the ground that the mark “FUCT” would be perceived as equivalent to the vulgar word,” (fucked). Brunetti said it is pronounced as four letters — F-U-C-T — but the court said “you might read it differently and, if so, you would hardly be alone.”

Later, Brunetti appealed before Supreme Court. Supreme Court ruled that this federal ban on the registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks violates the First Amendment right to free speech and thus is unconstitutional. The Hon’ble court followed the ruling in Matal v. Tam, in which the court held that the USPTO could not deny an Asian-American band called ‘The Slants’, a trademark based on its interpretation that the name was a racist slur and thus it could be perceived as a “disparaging” mark.

“Barring the FUCT trademark amounts to viewpoint discrimination, which is poison to a free society,” said. Justice Samuel Alito.

While deciding the case, Hon’ble Supreme Court laid down the following Rules:-

“The USPTO can’t “disfavour certain ideas”, the Govt. Cannot deny trademark registration to marks it considers immoral, scandalous, or disparaging on the basis of the Lanham Act. To do so is to discriminate based on viewpoint.

The First Amendment is meant to protect precisely the kind of speech that people generally view as offensive. What kind of specific language is offensive is a notion that shifts over time. It can depend on who is speaking and in what context.

It is not the government’s job to police speech through its intellectual property arm.”

Thus, these rules have now broadened the scope for trademark registration over such marks and before deciding whether a mark or word is scandalous or immoral, the above-mentioned rules set by the Hon’ble court need to be followed. This case marked a new beginning as all the dimensions for determining whether a mark is scandalous or not was discussed, and finally came up with a decision like never before.

For more information about Trademarks, Contact Lex Protector 

 

  • Categories
    Trademark
  • Author

    Lex Protector

Contents

Get Monthly

Global IP Updates

Join our community of over 10,000 subscribers and receive monthly updates on the latest IPR news and changes from around the globe.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

US Business Associations urge Obama to take corrective measure for fair trade with India

Messi Wins long battle over Trademark

Missing of trademark registration file from TMR office

Subscribe Us

Quick Links

  • Utility Patent Search
  • Patent Drafting
  • Patent Consultation
  • Design Patent Search
  • Portfolio
  • Partner Portal Login
  • Global IP Blogs
  • Todays Trademark Blog
  • Todays Patent Blog

Services

  • USA Trademark Registration
  • UK Trademark Registration
  • EU Trademark Registration
  • Indian Trademark Registration
  • Australia Trademark Registration
  • New Zealand Trademark Registration
  • Canada Trademark Registration
  • Copyright Registration
  • DMCA Takedown Notice

Contact Us

  • [email protected]
  • +1 – 888 890 6411 +1 (833) 535-9144 (FAX)
  • 16192 Coastal Highway, Lewes, Delaware 19958, USA

In India - Bhubaneswar | Ahmedabad | Bangalore | Guwahati | Mumbai

International - United States | United Kingdom | Australia | Estonia

© 2012-25 LEX PROTECTOR. All rights reserved

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA

Quick How the FUCT a mark becomes scandalous or Immoral