• Free Consultation
  • Free IP Audit
  • International Brand Protection
  • About
  • Careers
  • Global IP Blogs
  • Contact
  • Login
Lexprotector.com
+1 – 888 890 6411 [email protected]
  • Trademark
    • Trademark Search
      • Indian Trademark Search
      • USA Trademark Search
      • EU Trademark Search
      • UK Trademark Search
      • Canada Trademark Search
      • Australia Trademark Search
      • New Zealand Trademark Search
    • Trademark Registration
      • Indian Trademark Registration
      • USA Trademark Registration
      • EU Trademark Registration
      • UK Trademark Registration
      • Canada Trademark Registration
      • Australia Trademark Registration
      • New Zealand Trademark Registration
    • Trademark Monitoring
      • Indian Trademark Monitoring
      • USA Trademark Monitoring
      • EU Trademark Monitoring
      • UK Trademark Monitoring
      • Canada Trademark Monitoring
      • Australia Trademark Monitoring
      • New Zealand Trademark Monitoring
    • Trademark Consultation
      • Indian Trademark Consultation
      • USA Trademark Consultation
      • EU Trademark Consultation
      • UK Trademark Consultation
      • Canada Trademark Consultation
      • Australia Trademark Consultation
      • New Zealand Trademark Consultation
  • Patent
    • Patent Search
      • Prior Art Search
      • Freedom to Operate Search
      • Utility Patent Search
    • Patent Drafting
      • USA Provisional Patent Drafting
      • USA Non-Provisional Patent Drafting
      • Indian Provisional Patent Drafting
      • Indian Complete Specification Drafting
    • Patent Filing
      • USA Provisional Patent Filing
      • USA Non-Provisional Patent Filing
      • Indian Provisional Patent Filing
      • Indian Complete Specification Filing
    • Patent Consultation
      • Patent Consultation
      • Utility Patent Consultation
      • Design Patent Consultation
    • Design Patent
      • Design Patent Search
      • EU Design Patent Filing
      • USA Design Patent Filing
      • India Industrial Design Filing
  • IP Enforcement
    • Violation Search
    • DMCA Takedown Notice
    • IP Enforcement
      • Copyright Enforcement
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Utility Patent Enforcement
      • Design Patent Enforcement
    • Amazon Brand Registration
    • Copyright Registration
      • Indian Copyright Registration
      • USA Copyright Registration
  • IP Management
    • IP Due Diligence
    • IP Auditing
    • IP Valuation
    • IP Licensing
    • IP Consultation
+1 – 888 890 6411 [email protected]

THE BATTLE BETWEEN “THE TERRIBLE TOWEL” AND “THE TERRIBLE MASK”:IN WHOSE FAVOUR WILL THE DECISION LIE?

  • Older
  • Newer

THE BATTLE BETWEEN “THE TERRIBLE TOWEL” AND “THE TERRIBLE MASK”:IN WHOSE FAVOUR WILL THE DECISION LIE?

Written By: Amanya Shree Gangawat

“The Terrible Towel” is a registered trademark that has gained its popularity over the years in relation to an American Football Team, Pittsburgh Steelers. At present, it has been in controversy because an Indiana County has been engaged in selling its products under the trademark “The Terrible Mask”.

Before indulging in the controversy, we must first get familiar with the history of “The Terrible Towel”.”The Terrible Towel” Trademark, is a famous brand which was earlier owned by the Pittsburg sports broadcaster, Myron Cope.

He had gifted this right of a trademark to the Allegheny Valley School in 1966. Allegheny Valley School(AVS) Foundation is a non-profit organization that provides services to developmentally disabled persons. The name of the Foundation was changed from AVS Foundation to Eamon Foundation in 2016. Recently, an Indiana County shop is engaged in selling its product that is a mask in the trademark name “The Terrible Mask”.

Now looking towards the controversy, the Eamon Foundation has filed a suit against the Indiana County store which was selling its masks in the name of “The Terrible Mask” and profiting from its sale. It contended that the defendants have used the same “stylistic lettering” and this shows their intention to trade off the popularity as well as the goodwill which is associated with them.

The defendant on the other hand has alleged that a written agreement was entered between Mr.Cope and Mr.Goldberg(owner of Indiana County store), where Mr.Cope agreed that Mr.Goldberg has the right to sell any goods/products bearing the word “terrible”.However, they were not able to show proof of such written agreements.

If we make an analysis from both sides, to support any one of them seems to be difficult. However, the Eamon Foundation has a strong point in this case. As it has been engaged in selling its products under its trademark “The Terrible Towel” for years. It has built its reputation and goodwill worldwide and such action of Indiana County store of selling masks under the trademark “The Terrible Mask”, which has led to an increase in its profits, does amount to unfair business practice.

The use of exact “stylistic lettering” and words “The Terrible” is likely to cause confusion among the public. Under the Trademark Law, using similar words which cause or is likely to cause confusion to the public does amount to infringement. Earlier, two lawsuits were filed, the one was in 2012, in relation to the sale of Italian Language Terrible Towel, which ended through a settlement.

And the second one was in 2011, in relation to the sale of a T-shirt in the name of the trademark “Terrible T-Shirt”, which ended in favor of the Eamon Foundation. If one goes by this interpretation,it seems Eamon Foundation has a strong case in its favor.

 

But if we consider another aspect, then it has been claimed by the defendant that a written agreement was entered between Mr.Cope and Mr.Goldberg, where Mr.Cope agreed that Mr.Goldberg has the right to sell any goods/products bearing the word “terrible”.However, they were not able to show proof of such written agreements. But does this agreement really exists? It is still an unsolved mystery.

 

 

Overall, it is a win-win situation for the Eamon Foundation. However, if such a written agreement is shown as proof by the Indiana County store, the case will become more complicated. With the final decision pending, it will be interesting to see, who wins the war that is  “The Terrible Towel” or  “The Terrible Mask”.

For more information on Trademark, Contact Lex Protector

  • Categories
    Trademark
  • Author

    Lex Protector

Contents

Get Monthly

Global IP Updates

Join our community of over 10,000 subscribers and receive monthly updates on the latest IPR news and changes from around the globe.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

RAPUNZEL: THE MAIDEN IN TRADEMARK

NAKED LICENSING : A LEGAL AND FINANCIAL MINEFIELD

Delhi High Court dismisses the appeal of Marico Limited in the case of comparative advertising case Marico Limited vs Adani Wilmar Limited.

Subscribe Us

Quick Links

  • Utility Patent Search
  • Patent Drafting
  • Patent Consultation
  • Design Patent Search
  • Portfolio
  • Partner Portal Login
  • Global IP Blogs
  • Todays Trademark Blog
  • Todays Patent Blog

Services

  • USA Trademark Registration
  • UK Trademark Registration
  • EU Trademark Registration
  • Indian Trademark Registration
  • Australia Trademark Registration
  • New Zealand Trademark Registration
  • Canada Trademark Registration
  • Copyright Registration
  • DMCA Takedown Notice

Contact Us

  • [email protected]
  • +1 – 888 890 6411 +1 (833) 535-9144 (FAX)
  • 16192 Coastal Highway, Lewes, Delaware 19958, USA

In India - Bhubaneswar | Ahmedabad | Bangalore | Guwahati | Mumbai

International - United States | United Kingdom | Australia | Estonia

© 2012-25 LEX PROTECTOR. All rights reserved

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA

Quick THE BATTLE BETWEEN “THE TERRIBLE TOWEL” AND “THE TERRIBLE MASK”:IN WHOSE FAVOUR WILL THE DECISION LIE?